Need advice? Get in touch!
Close this search box.

Primacy of Relevance: Choosing Evidence in Court Proceedings


In the arena of court proceedings, where battles are fought with words, facts and evidence reign supreme. However, not all evidence is created equal. When it comes to deciding which documents should be included in court proceedings, the primacy of relevance cannot be understated. In this article, we explore the crucial role of relevance in the pursuit of justice, highlighting why it should be the guiding light of evidence selection in court proceedings.

The Relevance Rationale

Imagine a courtroom packed with stacks of paper, binders filled to the brim, and digital folders teeming with documents. Amidst this sea of information, the quest for justice begins. The relevance rationale calls for a discerning eye, filtering out the noise and focusing on what truly matters. Relevance serves as the compass, guiding the court towards the crux of the issues in dispute.

Why Relevance Matters

  1. Efficient Allocation of Resources: Court proceedings are time sensitive. Time is valuable, and resources are finite. Prioritising relevant evidence streamlines the process, ensuring that the court’s time and resources are utilised effectively, and saves the Judge from being confronted with enormous tender bundles from which only a handful of documents are relied on. Irrelevant documents are distracting and consume valuable time that could be better spent on matters that truly shape the case.
  1. Strengthening the Case: Relevance has a powerful impact on the strength of a case. Relevant evidence elevates arguments, reinforces claims, and demonstrates a proper understanding of the law, the issues, and the process. It allows the court to build a coherent narrative, backed by evidence that directly addresses the issues in dispute. In contrast, irrelevant evidence dilutes the strength of the case and can lead to confusion, lack of clarity, and increased costs.
  1. Ensuring Fairness: The overriding objective of any court proceeding is the just, quick, and cheap delivery administration of a dispute. Relevant evidence focuses the discussion on what truly matters so that the court can ensure a fair and balanced assessment of the case.
  1. Improved settlement discussions and costs: Relevant evidence strengthens a party’s position which provides added leverage for settlement discussions or mediation.  Additionally, by referring to relevant evidence, and particularly relevant documents, in a Calderbank offer a party can demonstrate the reasonableness of the offer, thereby increasing the prospects of a successful costs argument at the end of the proceedings.
  1. Judicial Decision-Making: it goes without saying that Judges are pivotal to the court process.  They evaluate evidence and make decisions informed by the evidence and argument presented. Prioritising relevance when submitting evidence enables Judges to focus on the heart of the matter and gain a clear understanding of the issues in dispute. This enables them to make well-reasoned, impartial judgments, rooted in the facts that truly matter. While success in court cannot be guaranteed, experience demonstrates that a clear, focused presentation of the case supported by relevant evidence is generally well received and does no harm to the chances of a successful outcome.

Challenges in Determining Relevance

While relevance should be paramount, its determination is not always a straightforward process. Different interpretations, subjective judgments, and the evolving nature of legal precedents can complicate the selection of evidence. However, by fostering a transparent and rigorous approach to relevance assessments, parties can mitigate these challenges and promote a clearer more concise case thereby improving the prospects of success.


In the realm of court proceedings, relevance rules. Its significance cannot be overstated when it comes to selecting evidence. By embracing the primacy of relevance, litigants can streamline proceedings, strengthen cases, and enhance the chance of success.

Remember, when it comes to the inclusion of evidence, relevance should be your guiding star, leading the way to a just, quick, cheap, and hopefully successful outcome.

To book an appointment with one of Mullane & Lindsay’s specialist litigators fill in the online enquiry form or telephone 02 4928 7300.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

Disputes can arise about the duties and obligations of an agent; for further information please contact David Collins or Kristy Nunn from our dispute resolution and litigation team.

Share this article

Contact Us